News & Updates

Upcoming RMME/STAT Colloquium (2/26): Edward Ip, “Partially Ordered Responses and Applications”

RMME/STAT Joint Colloquium:

Partially Ordered Responses and Applications

Edward Ip
Wake Forest University

Friday, February 26th, at 12:00PM EST

https://uconn-cmr.webex.com/uconn-cmr/j.php?MTID=mc1ed9d99b7e6b63ab2796d729867e365

Partially ordered set (poset) responses are prevalent in fields such as psychology, education, and health. For example, the psychopathologic classification of no anxiety (NA), mild anxiety (MA), anxiety with depression (AwD), and severe anxiety (SA) form a poset. Due in part to the lack of analytic tools, poset responses are often collapsed into other data forms such as ordinal data. During such a process, subtle information within a poset is inevitably lost. In this presentation, a longitudinal latent-variable model for poset responses and its application to health data will be described. It is argued that latent variable modeling enables the integration of information from both ordinal and nominal components in a poset. Using the abovementioned example, NA>{MA,AwD}>SA form the ordinal component, and MA and AwD form the nominal component. Specifically, it will be demonstrated that the latent variable model “discovers” implicit ordering within the nominal categories. This is possible because both intra-person and inter-person information are borrowed to reinforce inference. Some potential applications of the poset model will also be highlighted.

 

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Dr. Chris Rhoads to Deliver Keynote at LEAD Retreat

RMME faculty member, Dr. Chris Rhoads, will deliver a (virtual) keynote address at the LEAD retreat on April 16, 2021. The title of his talk is: Research Design for Educational Effectiveness Studies:  Statistical and Practical Considerations. The LEAD retreat is sponsored by the LEAD Graduate School and Research Network, which is based in Tubingen, Germany.

Upcoming RMME/STAT Colloquium (1/29): P. Richard Hahn, “The Bayesian Causal Forest Model: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects”

RMME/STAT Joint Colloquium:

The Bayesian Causal Forest Model: Regularization, Confounding, and Heterogeneous Effects

Richard Hahn
Arizona State University

January 29, 2021, at 12:00 EST

https://uconn-cmr.webex.com/uconn-cmr/j.php?MTID=mc19e545b14cc3a980ffc36760a5ce5f4

This talk will describe recent work on Bayesian supervised learning for conditional average treatment effects. Dr. Hahn will motivate the proposed Bayesian causal forest model in terms of fixing two specific flaws with previous approaches. One, our model allows for direct regularization of the treatment effect function, providing lower variance estimates of heterogeneous treatment effects. Two, by including an estimate of the propensity score as a control variable in our model we mitigate a phenomenon called “regularization induced confounding” that leads to substantial bias in previous approaches. Dr. Hahn will conclude with a detailed discussion of designing simulation studies to systematically investigate and validate machine learning models for causal inference.

Note: Dr. Hahn may also talk about this tutorial: https://math.la.asu.edu/~prhahn/xbcf_demo.html

January 2021 Evaluation Workshop with Dr. Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead

Register Now! RMME faculty member, Dr. Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead will give a 3-module workshop in January 2021, sponsored by Encompass Learning Center.

This workshop will focus on best practices for combining different evaluation methods or frameworks. It is open to evaluators working all over the globe. To register and access additional information, visit:  https://encompassworld.com/elc/upcoming/framework-weaving/

Mark Your Calendar: New RMME/STAT Joint Colloquia Announced!!

As a continuation of the presentation series this fall, the University of Connecticut’s Research Methods, Measurement, & Evaluation (RMME) program and Statistics department will jointly sponsor several additional RMME/STAT colloquia, starting in January of 2021. So, mark your calendar now! And as always, be sure to check the RMME website for more information as these talks approach!

1/29/2021 12:00-1:15pm EST P. Richard Hahn Arizona State University
2/26/2021 12:00-1:15pm EST Edward Ip Wake Forest University
3/26/2021 12:00-1:15pm EST David Dunson Duke University
4/16/2021 12:00-1:15pm EST Susan Paddock NORC University of Chicago
4/23/2021 2:00-3:15pm EST Jean-Paul Fox University of Twente
5/21/2021 12:00-1:15pm EST David Kaplan University of Wisconsin-Madison
9/10/2021 12:00-1:00pm EST Susan Murphy Harvard University

 

Dr. Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead Gives Talk: “Working with Youth in Evaluation”

On December 4, 2020, Dr. Bianca Montrosse-Moorhead (RMME faculty member) gave a fantastic talk, entitled “Working with Youth in Evaluation” for EvalYouth Global, a global, multi-stakeholder network that supports and promotes young and emerging evaluators (YEEs) and youth-led accountability around the world. In this presentation, Dr. Montrosse-Moorhead spoke about the foundations, principles, and tensions in youth participatory evaluation work. Interested individuals can access a copy of her presentation at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346629709_Working_with_Youth_in_Evaluation.

Upcoming RMME/STAT Colloquium (12/18): Paul De Boeck, “Response Accuracy and Response Time in Cognitive Tests”

RMME/STAT Joint Colloquium:

Response Accuracy and Response Time in Cognitive Tests

Paul De Boeck
The Ohio State University

December 18th at 12:00 EST

https://uconn-cmr.webex.com/uconn-cmr/j.php?MTID=m1b6efd4435a2cd17535d693bd2ac1a14

It is an old and still unresolved issue how much a cognitive test score reflects ability and how much it reflects speed. The well-known speed-accuracy tradeoff does not make an answer to the question easier. In the presentation I will report the results of my research steps to investigate the problem. Briefly summarized, the findings are as follows. First, the correlation of ability and speed across persons depends on the test. Second, based on different kinds of modeling and different kinds of data, there seem to be remaining item-wise dependencies (i.e., conditional dependencies) between response accuracy and response time after controlling for the underlying latent variables. Third, the remaining dependencies depend on the difficulties of the test items and the dependencies also are curvilinear. I will present an explanation for the findings, and a tentative, complex answer to the old question of what is being measured in a cognitive test.